STONEBRIEFPRODUCTION ENGINEERING SUPPORT
LAYER: C-SEAL · STATUS: YOURS

The question you shouldn't have to ask out loud.

Every PE who considers this arrangement has the same private question: "Can I lawfully seal work these engineers touch — or is this plan stamping?" It deserves a direct, public answer, so here it is, before the sales call ever happens.

What responsible charge actually requires

Licensure law across the states converges on the same structure: a licensed engineer may seal work prepared by unlicensed personnel provided the work was prepared under the licensee's direction and supervision — with the licensee directing the work throughout its preparation, having input before anything is finalized, and holding full authority to change it. What the law prohibits is the opposite pattern: reviewing and sealing work that someone else prepared independently. That's plan stamping, and boards discipline for it.

Why the seat model satisfies it — and mailed-back offshore work doesn't

A project shop that takes your files, produces plans overseas, and mails back a finished set puts your PE in exactly the posture boards warn about: reviewing completed work after the fact. A StoneBrief seat inverts that. Your engineer works inside your environment, takes direction from your PE or PM throughout preparation — morning queue, midday check, redlines, end-of-day note — and produces nothing your reviewer didn't direct. The supervision isn't retroactive paperwork; it's the literal daily workflow.

The structure is one your firm already runs: it is an EIT relationship. Every junior engineer on your staff produces work under direction that your PE reviews and seals. A StoneBrief engineer occupies the identical position in your org chart — supervised production staff — with a different mailing address. If your EIT workflow is compliant, this one is, because it is the same workflow.

What our engineers never do

They do not exercise independent design judgment. They do not sign or seal anything. They do not represent your firm to clients, agencies, or reviewers unless you explicitly ask. They do not make the calls — they draw the calls your PE makes. The C-SEAL layer stays frozen to us permanently, by law and by design, and we'd walk away from any client who asked us to thaw it.

The boundaries we'll name before you find them

Two, honestly stated. First: certain public contracts — some DOT and agency work — carry domestic-work or data-handling clauses; seats serve your private-sector book, which for most land development firms is the book. Second: responsible charge requires that your PE actually has bandwidth to direct the work. If your review capacity is already past its limit, one more producer makes that worse, not better — and we'd rather tell you that on the scoping call than discover it in week two.

We are staffing people, not your counsel — and the final word on your seal belongs to you and your board. What we can promise is that the arrangement is built for the supervised-preparation standard, we'll happily walk your compliance question through with your PE on the phone, and we will put the structure in writing in the seat agreement.

Structure, summarized.

walk it through with us
RESPONSIBLE CHARGE — SEAT STRUCTURE
Who directsYour PE / PM, throughout preparation — daily queue, redlines, review.
Where work livesYour server, your Civil 3D license, your templates. Nothing prepared outside your environment.
Who sealsYour PE — sealing only work prepared under their direction, as ever.
What we holdThe employment, the vetting, the replacement risk. Never the judgment.
In writingThe supervised-preparation structure is stated in the seat agreement you sign.